Hawkkeye´s ´projects´

[Hawkkeye666]

3 hours ago, Truly_happy said:

Oh, I love feathered dinosaurs.  Which are they? I never heard of any of those before.

Mongolia, upper Cretaceous, Nemegt formation. Part of Hendrix´s Walking with Dinosaurs series, except of Therizinosaurus. I used Demon Hunter´s model, because it´s feathered.

glad you like them!

[Fern]

I have a request from another thread for you. Puddles would like some frogs. I know ZT2 has a number of them. I do realise that they would be oversized but still it would be nice.

I also believe ZT2 has a number of butterflies as well

[Hawkkeye666]

Just a few changes in compatibility. I split South African exhibit into 2: one group of animal stays the same, compatible with ingame ostrich and Borsato´s Quagga (southern black korhaan, bluebuck, springbok, black wildebeest). Second group (blue crane, steenbok, common eland, springhare, red hartebeest/will be added in next part of ungulates/) I reworked, now they are compatible with Khaydar´s white rhinoceros. I think it looks rather nice:

I do not know why I ignored white rhino for so long in terms of compatibility, they are very often kept in mixed exhibits. So here they are, if you prefer this compatibility to the old one.

 

On 10/20/2021 at 11:11 PM, Fern said:

I have a request from another thread for you. Puddles would like some frogs. I know ZT2 has a number of them. I do realise that they would be oversized but still it would be nice.

I also believe ZT2 has a number of butterflies as well

There will be bullfrog for beaver´s pond.

 

*** files removed 20211030

[Fern]

Did you give them new ids or the same as before?

How many people want both versions?

 

[Hawkkeye666]

3 hours ago, Fern said:

Did you give them new ids or the same as before?

How many people want both versions?

 

They have same IDs, I think that someone would want one version or the other, not both.

[Fern]

I don't know about that, so lets see what people say first. Then I will decide how best to tackle it as far as the packs go.

[HeatherL]

I would like both versions. I like to construct natural exhibits that blend together using the invisible fence. Having the "same" animal in connecting exhibits would further that illusion.

[Hawkkeye666]

9 hours ago, Fern said:

I don't know about that, so lets see what people say first. Then I will decide how best to tackle it as far as the packs go.

ok, if they want, then you can release both versions.

8 hours ago, HeatherL said:

I would like both versions. I like to construct natural exhibits that blend together using the invisible fence. Having the "same" animal in connecting exhibits would further that illusion.

I am pretty sure I saw somewhere a hack that made animals happy in any exhibit, which you could make to your liking.

I think this is what you want. But I cannot find it...

[HeatherL]

I think you mean the Esy Animals Hack.I have that one in my download section. I've never used it as I prefer the challenge of fulfilling the actual requirements and making adjoining exhibits look like one. And I always assumed that hack only affected in-game animals.

[Hawkkeye666]

Andean birds.

 

Animals:

Andean Avocet, Chilean Flamingo, Andean Flamingo, James´s Flamingo,

Andean Cock-of-the-Rock (hehe), ashy-headed goose

 

Avocet and flamingoes are compatible together, goose and cock-of-the-rock (hehe) are compatible with my Andean forest exhibit (huemul, mountain paca, pudu, chinchila, + pacarana, mountain tapir and alpaca, to be released). Actually, I am thinking about reworking chinchila´s compatibility for ingame llama. I think llama´s exhibit would simulate better chinchila´s environment than my Andean forest. What do you think?

 

Enjoy!

 

*** files removed 20211030