Ashea Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 I am on AT&T/sbcgobal. Same thing happened me when I ran the trace - timed out. (Fern dear - I tried to pm you but your box must be full) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fern Posted March 19, 2013 Author Share Posted March 19, 2013 Yes it is.....nothing new there. lol My one at ztuf is almost empty. From Jay As for Firehawke's response, we were expecting the tracert for ztcdd.org to time out. What was important was where it timed out and how its results compared to the tracert for Phoenix. It might also show whether any of the computers it went through were SBC, Ameritech, or AT&T computers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firehawke Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 I reran the tracerts. Here's what I got... ZTP's tracert: 1 <1ms <1ms <1ms 144.216.40.254 2 1ms <1ms <1ms 10.255.252.254 3 <1ms <1ms <1ms 144.216.255.254 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 * * * Request timed out. 6 * * * Request timed out. 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 11ms 11 ms 11ms UNIVERSITY.car2.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.59.66.114] 9 46ms 46ms 46ms vlan113.car2.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.59.66.113] 10 45ms 46ms 46ms ae-11-11.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.69.136.101] 11 47ms 46ms 46ms ae-4-4.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.136.106] 12 45ms 45ms 46ms ae-6-6.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.140.190] 13 * * 45ms ae-1-51.edge4.Chicago3.Level3.net [4.69.138.134] 14 27ms 27ms 27ms te2-5.bbr01.eq01.chi01.networklayer.com [4.53.98.26] 15 27ms 27ms 27ms ae7.bbr01.eq01.chi1.networklayer.com [173.192.18.170 16 42 ms 42ms 43ms ae20.bbr01.eq01.da103.networklayer.com [173.192.18.136] 17 44ms 43ms 43ms ae5.dar01.sr01.da107.networklayer.com [173.192.18.179] 18 43ms 43ms 43ms po1.fcr01.sr01.da107.networklayer.com [50.22.118.131] 19 44ms 43ms 44ms 184.173.204.194-static.reverse.softlayer.com [184.173.204.194] Trace complete. Tracert on ztcdd.org: 1 <1ms <1ms <1ms 144.216.40.254 2 <1ms <1ms <1ms 10.255.252.254 3 <1ms <1ms <1ms 144.216.255.254 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 * * * Request timed out. 6 * * * Request timed out. 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 11ms 11ms 11ms UNIVERSITY.car2.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.59.66.114] 9 46ms 94ms 46ms vlan113.car2.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.59.66.113] 10 45ms 46ms 45ms ae-11-11.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.69.136.101] 11 48ms 48ms 49ms ae-4-4.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.136.106] 12 45ms 46ms 45ms ae-6-6.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.140.190] 13 * 46ms 46ms ae-1-51.edge4.Chicago3.Level3.net [4.69-138.134] 14 50ms 47ms 47ms dtag [4.68.62.222] 15 70ms 68ms 68ms 217.239.40.210 16 74ms 66ms 66ms 80.150.171.134 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 * * * Request timed out. 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. 21 * * * Request timed out. 22 * * * Request timed out. 23 * * * Request timed out. 24 * * * Request timed out. 25 * * * Request timed out. 26 * * * Request timed out. 27 * * * Request timed out. 28 * * * Request timed out. 29 * * * Request timed out. 30 * * * Request timed out. Trace complete Hope I typed up everything Jay needs!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(Admin)Savannahjan Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Would it make any difference if there was a different link straight into a topic? I remember at one point there was someone who could not get onto either our site or Unleashed, but they could get in to a direct link to an inner area. Then they could navigate to the main page. I think it was a link to an image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fern Posted March 20, 2013 Author Share Posted March 20, 2013 They could try any of the download links I put in the DG topic since they cannot get there either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashea Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I did try that yesterday with a direct link to the Socrata thread at DD - No luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firehawke Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 I've tried the link at the beginning of the thread and the links in Fern's sig. I also just tried a link in the DG topic. No luck. :gnomesmileyf: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fern Posted March 22, 2013 Author Share Posted March 22, 2013 I don't know what changed but Ashea and Cricket can now get back on. Maybe the isp concerned realised there was a problem. It might have affected other sites and someone complained. Who knows and I guess we never will know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(Admin)Cricket Posted March 22, 2013 Share Posted March 22, 2013 I am so beyond pleased that we can get back on now!!!! You know, the only thing that I can think of that changed was that an automatic windows update got applied the other night. Apparently, it was some sort of service pack. That must have 'shook something loose' lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARIZNANA Posted March 22, 2013 Share Posted March 22, 2013 Windows updates are notorious for causing problems . My automatic update is turned off . and I reload my os for winxp every 6 mos. winxp and ie8 were never meant to work together either so i that also causes problems . Most websites no longer like ie7 but they will accecpt ie6 . Dont know why that is because ie6 is slower . Glad you are all back on and ok now . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newest Member
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now